Info in English

toplogo2lille.gif (1694 bytes)

 
 

 

Henning Aaager
Henning@Aaager.dk

Production planner. Leader of public and private organisations. Own service company. Teaches in group dynamics. Didactic sexologist, university degree. Promoter in several mercantile development projects. Generate prosperity tours, organisations self-knowledge and consciousness. Textbook writer.

 

Eva Larsen
Eva@Royal-Service.dk

Secretary, Medical laboratory technician, Zone therapy, Body therapy, Acupuncture, Homeopath, Lifeline therapy, Relaxation of tension, Shiatsu massage, Vegatate, Biofeedback, Mental development, Self-fulfilment.





What is the Problem of Consciousness?

For much of the present century, the various phenomena related to human consciousness have been ignored by many sectors of the scientific community as unsuited to empirical investigation and inappropriate for scientific study. Recently this picture has been changing due to a variety of cultural factors. Thoughtful people from a wide variety of backgrounds and professional disciplines from neurology to ethnology, from psychology to molecular biology, and from electrophysiology to mathematical physics are now asking such questions as:

  • What is consciousness?
  • What are appropriate and potentially fruitful methods for studying consciousness?
  • How can the advent of recent tools in neurophysiology, PET scans, functional MRI, and the like help to clarify the nature of consciousness?
  • What role does our inner life have to play in the theories of modern science?
  • Is it possible to reconcile our view of ourselves as active responsible agents with the different perspective on the self emerging from cognitive science?
  • What would be the implications of such a reconciliation for ethics and the orderly functioning of society?
  • Can the study of consciousness provide any clarification of the insights derived from religious and contemplative traditions and vice versa?
  • Must the purview of science be expanded in order to capture the essential elements of conscious phenomena, or are more traditional approaches up to the task?
  • To facilitate a dialogue in an international community of scholars, students and researchers. This dialogue will be characterized by openness, mutual respect, inclusiveness, integrity, and synergy. We support the development of an international and interdisciplinary science of consciousness, which would seek new ways to express and understand the relationships between mind and matter through a variety of activities including: international conferences, Web-based information, and scholarly publications in the Journal of Consciousness Studies and elsewhere.

These and related questions are stimulating vigorous debates between proponents of what some call 'hard' and 'soft' approaches to the study of mental phenomena. On the extremely hard side of the debate stand those proponents of artificial intelligence who claim that conscious human experiences are merely epiphenomenal artifacts of neural activity, which can be explained within the reductive paradigm and will inevitably be reproduced in computers. On the soft end of the spectrum of current opinions are some dualists who would argue that the essential nature of consciousness lies beyond human understanding. Others with various commitments to psychology, psychiatry, humanism, and contemplative practice are coming to believe that the purview of science must be enlarged in order to capture the phenomena of consciousness.

More information:


Center for Consciousness Studies
University of Arizona

info@royal-service.dk